NASA’s DAGGER could give advance warning of the next big solar storm

There’s enough trouble on this planet already that we don’t need new problems coming here from the sun. Unfortunately, we can’t yet destroy this pitiless star, so we are at its mercy. But NASA at least may soon be able to let us know when one of its murderous flares is going to send our terrestrial systems into disarray.

Understanding and predicting space weather is a big part of NASA’s job. There’s no air up there, so no one can hear you scream, “Wow, how about this radiation!” Consequently, we rely on a set of satellites to detect and relay this important data to us.

One such measurement is of solar wind, “an unrelenting stream of material from the sun.” Even NASA can’t find anything nice to say about it! Normally this stream is absorbed or dissipated by our magnetosphere, but if there’s a solar storm, it may be intense enough that it overwhelms the local defenses.

When this happens, it can set electronics on the fritz, since these charged particles can flip bits or disrupt volatile memory like RAM and solid state storage. NASA relates that even telegraph stations weren’t safe, blowing up during the largest on-record solar storm, 1859’s Carrington Event.

While we can’t stop these stellar events from occurring, we might be able to better prepare for them if we knew they were coming. But usually by the time we know, they’re basically already here. But how can we predict such infrequent and chaotic events?

View of NASA’s SOHO satellite being overwhelmed during a 2003 solar storm. Image Credits: NASA

A joint project between NASA, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Department of Energy at the Frontier Development Lab has been looking into this issue, and the answer is exactly what you’d expect: machine learning.

The team collected data on solar flares from multiple satellites monitoring the sun, as well as from ground stations watching for geomagnetic disruptions (called perturbations), like those that affect technology. The deep learning model they designed identified patterns in how the former leads to the latter, and they call the resulting system DAGGER: Deep leArninG Geomagnetic pErtuRbation.

Yes, it’s a stretch. But it seems to work.

Using geomagnetic storms that hit Earth in 2011 and 2015 as test data, the team found that DAGGER was able to quickly and accurately forecast their effects across the globe. This combines the strengths of previous approaches while avoiding their disadvantages. As NASA put it:

Previous prediction models have used AI to produce local geomagnetic forecasts for specific locations on Earth. Other models that didn’t use AI have provided global predictions that weren’t very timely. DAGGER is the first one to combine the swift analysis of AI with real measurements from space and across Earth to generate frequently updated predictions that are both prompt and precise for sites worldwide.

It may be a bit before you get a solar alert on your phone telling you to pull over or your car might stop working (this won’t actually happen…probably), but it could make a big difference when we know there’s vulnerable infrastructure that could suddenly shut down. A few minutes’ warning is better than none!

You can read the paper describing the DAGGER model, which, by the way, is open source, in this issue of the journal Space Weather.

NASA’s DAGGER could give advance warning of the next big solar storm by Devin Coldewey originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/EBh6usi
via Technews
Share:

A judge dismissed Phhhoto’s antitrust suit against Meta

A U.S. District Court Judge for the Eastern District of New York threw out a lawsuit against Meta this week that had been simmering for a year and a half.

The suit, filed in late 2021 by now-shuttered social app Phhhoto, alleged that Meta violated federal antitrust law by copying its core features with the Instagram-adjacent video looping app Boomerang. Like Boomerang, which Meta launched in October of 2015 and later integrated into Instagram itself, Phhhoto invited users to share very short GIF-like loops.

U.S. District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto ultimately granted Meta’s motion to dismiss the complaint due to time-limits imposed by the relevant statutes of limitations.

“Phhhoto has failed in its 69-page Amended Complaint of 222 paragraphs to allege sufficient facts that cure the untimeliness of all of its federal claims,” Matsumoto wrote in the opinion, calling the possibility of any amendment to resolve the issue of the lawsuit’s timing “futile.”

In the lawsuit, Phhhoto alleged that Boomerang was the culmination of Facebook’s anticompetitive full-court press, effectively killing the smaller company with a copycat app that reproduced Phhhoto’s offering “feature-by-feature.”

In a statement, Meta spokesperson Stephen Peters noted that Meta was pleased with the outcome, maintaining that the suit was “meritless.”

The saga had a few twists and turns, including evidence that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg himself downloaded Phhhoto and made an account a full year before launching Boomerang. Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom, who led Instagram at the time, also explored the app’s features at the time.

According to the lawsuit, Facebook began chatting up the team at Phhhoto, even dangling a partnership — an offer that languished and never materialized. By 2017, Phhhoto was no more.

A judge dismissed Phhhoto’s antitrust suit against Meta by Taylor Hatmaker originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/wkxtvdQ
via Technews
Share:

Celebrities don’t want to pay Elon for a blue check

April 1 is the dumbest day on the internet, and this year, it’s not just because brands will try to prank you by selling “hot iced coffee.” Starting on Saturday, Twitter will begin removing blue checks from “legacy verified” users if they don’t sign up for a Twitter Blue subscription. This is part of new owner Elon Musk’s grand plan to make Twitter profitable, but this particular scheme has a glaring issue: if anyone with $8 per month can get a blue check, the symbol won’t be cool anymore (and also disinformation will proliferate, but Musk doesn’t seem super worried about that).

Twitter initially launched its verification system in 2009 to protect celebrities from impersonation. Someone made an account pretending to be former St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa, but instead of just asking for the account to be taken down, La Russa sued Twitter. And so, the three-year-old company introduced its iconic blue check badge.

Now, we’ve come full circle. Celebrities are a day away from losing their verification badges, and you might think they would lament the loss of this symbol that was literally created to protect them. Unfortunately for Musk, paying for Twitter Blue is cheugy, so some celebrities have spoken out to say that they won’t be paying for a blue check.

At the beginning of the month, the musician Ice Spice weighed in: “1M on here is heavy blue check wya :’)”

What she means is that people will know she is who she says she is, since a scam account couldn’t compete with her 1.2 million followers. She has a point, but we know that people don’t always click on your profile when they’re not sure you’re real — they might just believe that insulin is free now (it is not).

In that chaotic first few days of Twitter’s new verification program — a time when anyone could instantly get a blue check, change their handle, and impersonate others — basketball superstar LeBron James was one of the first celebrities to be impersonated. On an account verified with Twitter Blue, someone pretending to be James posted that he was requesting a trade from the Los Angeles Lakers back to the Cleveland Cavaliers. This was not true, but the news spread anyway.

James still doesn’t want to pay for a blue check, he said on Twitter.

James is the highest-paid NBA player of all time, earning over $40 million per year. That makes it all the more hilarious that he won’t pay.

For some celebrities, it’s not about the $8. It’s about the principle of it. Actor William Shatner tweeted at Musk, “Now you’re telling me that I have to pay for something you gave me for free?”

But also, everyone knows how uncool they will look if they pay to be verified. Michael Thomas, a wide receiver for the NFL’s New Orleans Saints, summed it up best: “Don’t nobody want that raggedy blue check no way anymore 😂

This year’s Super Bowl MVP Patrick Mahomes II, also an extremely well-paid athlete, joked that he can’t pay the $8 because he has kids to take care of.

Philadelphia Eagles cornerback Darius Slay made an excellent point (and also, he is on the best team in the NFL, don’t fact-check me, this is true). If someone wants to impersonate him, then maybe raging Philly fans will accidentally tweet their complaints to the wrong person.

Other stars took the time to tell their followers that even if they lose their check, they are who they say they are… but they still don’t want to pay for verification. Monica Lewinsky posted a set of screenshots showing what happens when you search her name on Twitter. There are already many impersonators, some of whom have a paid blue check.

She added, “in what universe is this fair to people who can suffer consequences for being impersonated? a lie travels half way around the world before truth even gets out the door.”

“Seinfeld” actor Jason Alexander said that if he loses his check, he will leave the platform altogether, since he is worried about impersonation.

Even New Order bassist Peter Hook weighed in. The 67-year-old Brit earnestly reminded his followers that he will never sell anything to fans via DM.

Impersonation is clearly the biggest concern among celebrities (… and journalists), but there are other benefits to Twitter Blue beyond the blue check. According to Musk, only verified users’ tweets will be shown in the “For You” feed. Still, we can’t imagine LeBron is too worried about getting eyes on his tweets. The dude has 52 million followers.

Celebrities don’t want to pay Elon for a blue check by Amanda Silberling originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/HgdNvoX
via Technews
Share:

Twitter reveals some of its source code, including its recommendation algorithm

As repeatedly promised by Twitter CEO Elon Musk, Twitter has opened a portion of its source code to public inspection, including the algorithm it uses to recommend tweets in users’ timelines.

On GitHub, Twitter published two repositories containing code for many parts that make the social network tick, including the mechanism Twitter uses to control the tweets users see on the For You timeline. In a blog post, Twitter characterized the move as a “first step to be[ing] more transparent” while at the same time “[preventing] risk” to Twitter itself and people on the platform.

On a Twitter Spaces session today, Musk clarified:

“Our initial release of the so-called algorithm is going to be quite embarrassing, and people are going to find a lot of mistakes, but we’re going to fix them very quickly,” Musk said. “Even if you don’t agree with something, at least you’ll know why it’s there, and that you’re not being secretly manipulated … The analog, here, that we’re aspiring to is the great example of Linux as an open source operating system … One can, in theory, discover many exploits for Linux. In reality, what happens is the community identifies and fixes those exploits.”

On that second point in the blog post about preventing risk, the open source releases don’t include the code that powers Twitter’s ad recommendations or the data used to train Twitter’s recommendation algorithm. Moreover, they include few instructions on how to inspect or actually use the code — reinforcing the idea that the releases are strictly developer-focused.

“[We excluded] any code that would compromise user safety and privacy or the ability to protect our platform from bad actors, including undermining our efforts at combating child sexual exploitation and manipulation,” Twitter wrote. “We [also took] steps to ensure that user safety and privacy would be protected.”

Twitter says it’s working on tools to manage code suggestions from the community and sync changes to its internal repository. Presumably, those will be made available at a future date — there’s no sign of them at the present.

“We’re going to look for suggestions, not just on bugs but also on how the algorithm should work,” Musk said on the Spaces session. “It’s going to be an evolving process. I wouldn’t expect it to be a nonstop upward movement… but we’re very open to what would improve the user experience.”

At first glance, algorithm is fairly complex — but not necessarily surprising in any way from a technical standpoint. It’s made up of multiple models, including a model for detecting “not safe for work” or abusive content, the likelihood of a Twitter user interacting with another user and calculating a Twitter user’s “reputation.” (It’s unclear what “reputation” refers to, exactly; the high-level documentation isn’t clear.) Several neural networks are responsible for ranking the tweets and recommending accounts to follow, while a filtering component hides tweets to — forgive the jargon — “support legal compliance, improve product quality, increase user trust, protect revenue through the use of hard-filtering, visible product treatments and coarse-grained downranking.”

In an engineering blog post, Twitter reveals more about the recommendation pipeline, which it claims runs approximately five billion times per day:

“We attempt to extract the best 1,500 tweets from a pool of hundreds of millions … Today, the For You timeline consists of 50% [tweets from people you don’t follow] and 50% [tweets from people you follow] on average, though this may vary from user to user,” Twitter wrote. “Ranking [tweets] is achieved with a ~48-million-parameter neural network that is continuously trained on tweet interactions to optimize for positive engagement (e.g. likes, retweets and replies).”

The release of the source code comes after several controversies involving tweaks to Twitter’s recommendation algorithm in recent months. According to Platformer, in February, Musk called on Twitter’s engineers to reconfigure the algorithm so his tweets would be more widely viewed. (Twitter later walked back this change — at least somewhat.) In November, Twitter began showing users more tweets from people they don’t follow — a move the platform attempted prior to Musk’s acquisition but later reversed after a backlash from users.

Twitter reveals some of its source code, including its recommendation algorithm by Kyle Wiggers originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/nyQWGxX
via Technews
Share:

Hulu debuts a new interface with a vertical sidebar on Fire TV, Apple TV and Roku

Hulu is slowly rolling out a new interface on streaming devices like Fire TV, Apple TV and Roku, among other compatible devices. The new redesign moves the navigation to the left side with options for TV, Movies and My Stuff.

The company confirmed to TechCrunch that the updated interface began rolling yesterday. It will be available across all supported connected TV devices in the coming months, including Android TV devices as well as Chromecast, LG smart TVs, Samsung smart TVs, Vizio SmartCast TVs and more.

Cord Cutter News was the first to report the new interface.

Users that have seen the update were welcomed with a message from Hulu that writes, “Over the next few weeks, Hulu’s navigation menu will move to the left side of the screen on living room devices. Press ‘back’ to open the menu for easy access to TV, Movies, My Stuff, and more.”

The update makes it easier for TV users to navigate to these destinations. Previously, viewers had to scroll all the way up to the top of the page. Users can now click on the remote’s back button to access the menu.

Image Credits: TechCrunch

The streaming company’s last major redesign push for the big screen was in 2020 when it introduced categories like “TV,” “Movies” and “Sports” through top navigation.

Last October, the streaming service raised its prices from $6.99 per month to $7.99 per month for the ad-supported plan and from $12.99 per month to $14.99 per month for the ad-free plan. Disney’s ad-supported bundled plan with ESPN+, Disney+ and Hulu also went from $13.99 per month to $14.99 per month.

In December, Hulu also hiked the Live TV bundle prices from $69.99 per month to $74.99 per month for the Basic plan, which offers Hulu Live TV and ESPN+ with ads and Disney+ with no ads. The premium plan got a raise from $75.99 per month to $82.99 per month, which offers Hulu + Live TV and Disney+ with no ads and ESPN+ with ads.

Hulu debuts a new interface with a vertical sidebar on Fire TV, Apple TV and Roku by Ivan Mehta originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/NQI6gat
via Technews
Share:

The lowdown for European startups looking to raise money in 2023

We’re an impatient bunch here at TechCrunch+, so while we await tidied quarterly venture reports from major startup databases, we’re also running our own queries to get early looks at the state of the fundraising world. As it’s the last day of the first quarter, we’re too antsy to wait any longer to see what’s been going on in Europe. Let’s take an early peek.

In the wake of Techstars’ decision to leave the Swedish market, we looked at Sweden’s startup scene earlier this week following a glance at what is happening in the United States. Those were useful exercises, but we’ll need a broader dataset to really set our bearings. To that end, let’s look at all of Europe and then consider the three largest venture markets in the region: the U.K., Germany and France.


The Exchange explores startups, markets and money.

Read it every morning on TechCrunch+ or get The Exchange newsletter every Saturday.


The numbers are fascinating and can be read as either bullish or bearish. The negative take is simple: European venture totals are down from a year ago. The more positive perspective is also worth considering: When we focus our view on just the last few quarters, it appears that venture is done contracting.

Naturally, we’ll have oodles more data and charts when Q1 2023 data fully drops, but we can get a head start. Let’s talk Europe.

Inside Europe’s Q1 2023 venture results

European startups raised $28.85 billion across 2,274 deals in Q1 2023, according to preliminary PitchBook data. That’s less than in Q1 2021, but we already know (and you may be tired of hearing by now) that the 2021 venture vintage was an outlier. However, the figure also represents a year-on-year decline, which may sound like a surprise: In Q1 2022, the downturn had already started in the U.S.

The lowdown for European startups looking to raise money in 2023 by Anna Heim originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/j6RcSfZ
via Technews
Share:

Pokémon GO will raise the price of remote raid passes

Pokémon GO is raising the price of remote raid passes, the mobile game announced today. Players used to be able to buy one pass for 100 coins (about $1) or three passes for 250 coins (about $2.50), but the cost of these items will nearly double to 195 coins for one pass, or 525 coins for three passes. Players will now be able to participate in only five raids per day.

Raid battles are a key component in Pokémon GO, requiring players to meet up at a set location in real life to battle an extra strong or rare Pokémon. When much of the world went into lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic, remote raid passes were initially introduced to enable people to participate in raid battles from afar…and to give its parent company Niantic another income stream. As of last year, Pokémon GO surpassed the milestone of $6 billion in revenue from in-app purchases. 

“We believe this change is necessary for the long-term health of the game, and we do not make it lightly,” the Pokémon GO team wrote in a blog post. “We feel this is a necessary step toward our goal of preserving and improving the unique experience of playing Pokémon GO.”

Niantic’s AR-based mobile games are designed to encourage users to explore the world around them, and remote raid passes may seem to contradict that mission — there’s less reason to meet up with other players outside when you can play the game from home. But the feature also made the game more accessible to people who may have mobility issues or other limitations that prevent them from going out to catch ’em all.

Niantic made significant changes to Pokémon GO at the beginning of the pandemic, like making it easier to interact with PokéStops or gyms from afar. The game also tried to roll back that feature in August 2021, which prompted Pokémon GO influencers to threaten a boycott of the game. Niantic ended up scrapping that plan after the backlash.

As one of the most profitable mobile games ever, Pokémon GO itself isn’t particularly desperate for cash. But it seems like Niantic could be facing headwinds. The company was valued at $9 billion in November 2021, when the company openly bashed Meta and declared it would build a “real-world metaverse,” but like many tech companies, the company conducted layoffs last year and canceled four projects.

Pokémon GO plays a vital role in Niantic’s growth beyond its contributions as a cash cow. Niantic’s plans to build its “AR metaverse” rely on its trove of AR location data, which Pokémon GO has been instrumental in building — players get in-game bonuses if they scan real-life locations in AR. Players don’t need to share AR scans to play Pokémon GO, but perhaps they’re more likely to do so if they’re playing the game outside of their home.

Pokémon GO will raise the price of remote raid passes by Amanda Silberling originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/10OZvYp
via Technews
Share:

Audible is testing ad-supported access to select titles for non-members

Audible is testing ad-supported access to select titles for non-members, the Amazon-owned audiobook company revealed on a help page on its website. The company confirmed to TechCrunch that the test is very limited and does not apply to paid members. The news was first reported by Marketing Brew.

The move indicates that the company may be exploring the possibility of an ad-based membership option. Audible declined to comment on any specific plans.

The test includes audiobooks, podcasts and Audible Originals. Audible says the test applies to a limited subsection of titles on its platform. Content providers were informed of the change and given the chance to opt out of ads. Users who are part of the test will hear a total of eight ads within a 24-hour period. Audible says it has taken additional measures to make sure that ads won’t be heard too frequently within a short time span.

“Audible is dedicated to continuously optimizing how we deliver audio programming to listeners everywhere,” the company’s help page about the test reads. “From time to time, Audible tests new products and services to gain knowledge about the evolving needs of our customers and partners.”

Audible confirmed that it’s conducting the test in a few different regions, but didn’t specify which ones. We understand that the U.S. is one of these regions, given that the help page was published on the company’s U.S. website.

The company currently offers an Audible Plus membership plan that costs $7.95 per month and includes a selection of Audible Originals, audiobooks, sleep tracks, meditation programs and podcasts. Audible also offers an Audible Premium Plus plan that costs $14.95 and includes everything available in its Plus plan in addition to one title per month from an extended selection of best sellers and new releases. It’s possible that Audible may want to grow out its current membership offerings by adding a cheaper, more affordable ad-based option in order to compete with other audiobook companies, including new entrants like Spotify.

Spotify, which is largely known for music and podcasts, expanded into the audiobooks industry back in 2021 when it acquired digital audiobook distributor Findaway. Like Audible, Spotify may also be looking to incorporate ads into its service, as Spotify Chief Content Officer Dawn Ostroff said last year during the company’s Investor Day event that the streaming service was “looking at bringing ad monetization into audiobooks.” The company hasn’t shared any further details on this front since then.

It’s worth noting that this isn’t the first time that Audible has explored the possibility of ads on its platform, as the company confirmed a few years back that it was testing ads, but didn’t go live with them.

Audible is testing ad-supported access to select titles for non-members by Aisha Malik originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/raA4C9e
via Technews
Share:

Netflix’s ad-supported plan comes to Apple TV after months of delay

When Netflix launched its ad-supported plan four months ago, there were a few devices the plan didn’t support — Apple TV being one of them. Starting this week, the cheaper tier is available in the Netflix tvOS app.

A Reddit user that goes by websgeisti noticed the update yesterday. The user noted that Netflix’s Basic with Ads plan is available on the latest version (2.3.0) of the Netflix app on Apple TV.

Netflix confirmed to TechCrunch that support on tvOS is now available for the ad-supported tier.

Image Credits: TechCrunch

Previously, Apple TV users were unable to access the ads tier and were instead asked to either upgrade to Netflix’s pricier plans or try on a different device.

When TechCrunch reached out to Netflix back in November, the company told us that while the Basic with Ads plan isn’t available on tvOS at launch, it would be coming soon.

The tier has yet to become available on Chromecast, Chromecast Ultra, PlayStation 3 and the Netflix app for Windows.

Despite the delay in adding the supported devices, among other setbacks like fewer titles, Netflix previously shared how happy it was about the success of its new tier. At the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Netflix President of Worldwide Advertising Jeremi Gorman said there is a “broad swath” of advertisers on the platform.

However, a month after it launched, analytics firm Antenna reported that only 9% of new Netflix subscribers in the United States signed up for the cheaper plan.

Netflix rolled out its $6.99/month ad-supported plan in November 2022 to subscribers in the U.S., the U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Australia, Japan, Korea, Brazil, Canada and Mexico. Ads are 15 to 30 seconds long, and there’s an average of four to five minutes of ads per hour. The Basic with Ads plan has a lower video quality of 720p HD and subscribers can only stream from one device at the same time. Around 5% to 10% of Netflix’s content catalog is unavailable due to licensing restrictions. Plus, subscribers don’t have access to offline viewing with the ad-supported plan.

Netflix’s ad-supported plan comes to Apple TV after months of delay by Lauren Forristal originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/yQ0bRjK
via Technews
Share:

Waymo retires its self-driving Chrysler Pacifica minivan

More than five years ago, a newly minted Waymo took the wraps off of what would become its first commercialized autonomous vehicle: a Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid minivan loaded with sensors and software.

Now, the minivan, a symbol of the early and hypey AV days, is headed for retirement as Waymo transitions its fleet to the all-electric Jaguar I-Pace vehicles equipped with its fifth-generation self-driving system.

When the Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid AV was first revealed, it might not have been what people expected from the former Google self-driving project turned Alphabet-owned business. The design wasn’t ripped from the pages of a graphic sci-fi novel and it was hardly flashy. But the white minivan — highlighted with the same blue and green accent colors found on the Waymo logo — embodied the company’s aim. Waymo wanted a friendly looking vehicle people would feel comfortable using.

The partnership with established manufacturer Fiat Chrysler — now Stellantis — also derisked an already risky frontier tech pursuit. Under the deal, Fiat Chrysler would handle the manufacturing and provide Waymo with minivans that built in redundancies designed for autonomous driving.

Waymo never got close to the 62,000-minivan order it agreed to in 2018 as part of an expanded partnership with Fiat Chrysler. But the minivan did become a critical part of its commercialization plan and over its lifespan the fleet provided tens of thousands of rides with the public, according to the company. (Waymo has never revealed detailed figures of its minivan fleet beyond that its total global fleet is somewhere around 700 vehicles.)

“It’s bittersweet to see it go,” said Chris Ludwick, product management director at Waymo who has been at the company since 2012, told TechCrunch. “But I’m also happy for this next chapter.”

A bit of history

Waymo revealed the Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid in December 2016 and then provided more technical and business model details a month later at the 2017 North American International Auto Show. The first look at the minivan in December came just five days after Google’s self-driving project officially announced that it was a business with a new name and slightly tweaked mission.

At the time, little was known about what the Google self-driving project — also known as Chauffeur — intended to do beyond a stated goal to commercialize self-driving cars. The Google self-driving project had developed a custom low speed vehicle without a steering wheel called the Firefly, but that cute gumdrop-shaped car never made it to commercial robotaxi status.

Waymo Firefly and Chrysler Pacifica autonomous vehicles

Waymo Firefly and Chrysler Pacifica autonomous vehicles. Image Credits: Waymo

The lowly minivan seemed to represent a more grounded realistic vision towards the goal. By spring 2017, the company had launched an early rider program that let real people in the Phoenix area (who had been vetted and signed an NDA) use an app to hail a self-driving Chrysler Pacifica minivan with a human safety operator behind the wheel.

Waymo eventually opened up the service to the public — no NDA required — and grew its service area to Phoenix suburbs Chandler, Tempe, Ahwatukee and Mesa. Waymo repeated that process as it took the important step of removing the human safety operator from behind the wheel, launching driverless rides in 2019 and eventually a driverless robotaxi service in 2020 that was open to the public.

Minivan proving ground

Image Credits: Waymo

The minivan’s initial reveal represented the moment when “Chauffeur” became Waymo and less of a science project, he noted. But there was still considerable work to be done.

The Chrysler Pacifica was the ultimate commercial proving ground, according to anecdotes from Ludwick, who recounted the progress of moving from autonomous driving 10 miles in one day, then 100 miles, and then a 100 miles everyday.

For instance, the company discovered that families were far more enthusiastic to use the minivan than it assumed. The minivan also helped develop the company’s AV operations playbook, including  how to park vehicles in between rides and where to locate depots for maintenance and charging.

The minivan was also became a testbed for how to operate a driverless fleet during the Covid-19 pandemic. Prior to Covid, the fleet in Phoenix was a mix of driverless vehicles and those with human safety operators behind the wheel.

“In three months we turned it fully driverless and figured out how to disinfect the vehicles between each ride,” he said.

All-electric chapter

Waymo jaguar ipace autonomous vehicle

Image Credits: Waymo

The next chapter for Waymo is focused on its all-electric Jaguar I-Pace vehicles, which will be pulled into the service area in the Phoenix suburbs of Chandler and Tempe that the minivan covered. The Jaguar I-Pace is currently the go-to driverless vehicle for robotaxi rides in downtown Phoenix and to the Phoenix International Sky Harbor Airport. The 24/7 service runs on a five-mile stretch between downtown Phoenix and an airport shuttle stop, specifically, the 44th Street Sky Train station.

On Thursday, the White House gave a shout out to Waymo (along with other companies) for its commitment to an all-electric fleet as part of the White House EV Acceleration Challenge.

Waymo intends to deploy the all-electric Jaguar I-PACE across all of its ride-hailing service territories this spring now that the minivan has been retired. The nod to Waymo was part of a larger announcement from the Biden Administration around public and private sector investments into EVs as part of its goal of having 50% of all new vehicle sales be electric by 2030.

The next task for Waymo may be its most challenging: The company has to figure out how to grow the service, charge its all-electric fleet efficiently and eventually turn a profit.

But Ludwick believes the company is well positioned thanks, in part, to the Chrysler Pacifica.

“When I look at what the Pacifica got us, it’s a lot,” he said, noting that the vehicle had to travel at higher speeds and make unprotected left turns.

Waymo retires its self-driving Chrysler Pacifica minivan by Kirsten Korosec originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/KlaAJuP
via Technews
Share:

Twitter alternative T2 launches new verification program, hires Discord engineering head as CTO

As Twitter begins its shift to a “pay to play” business model, a new Twitter alternative is preparing to take flight. T2, the seed-funded Twitter rival developed by Google and Twitter veterans, is ready to capitalize on Twitter’s upheaval with the launch of a verification program specifically targeting those who are poised to lose their checkmark under Elon Musk’s new Twitter policies. T2 is also today announcing a notable new hire with the addition of Discord’s former Senior Director of Engineering, Michael Greer, as its new Chief Technology Officer (CTO).

Greer joined Discord in 2017, initially as Director of Engineering, which touched on a number of areas, including revenue, growth, apps, community servers, design systems, messaging, and more. He was promoted to Senior Director of Engineering just last June. Prior to Discord, Greer worked as the CTO at Tapp Media and The Onion for multi-year stints.

At T2, Greer will now oversee the development team and will guide the company’s technical growth.

“Michael’s deep experience across news, entertainment, and social platforms maps perfectly to our vision for T2,” said T2 co-founder Gabor Cselle, who sold his prior companies to Twitter and Google prior to starting T2. “At the Onion and Tapp, he and his teams built platforms that generated engagement from millions of users. At Discord, he directed his teams to create tools that have successfully maintained safety and civility – even in energetic, raucous communities,” Cselle added.

T2’s development has been fairly rapid, having only committed its first lines of code in November 2022, then raising its first outside funding with a $1.1 million seed round this January. While there are a number of Twitter alternatives now gaining traction in the wake of Elon Musk’s chaotic takeover of Twitter, one of T2’s biggest differentiators is its co-founding team.

Cselle previously sold his Y Combinator-backed email startup reMail to Google and his second company, native ads startup Namo Media, to Twitter. Meanwhile, Sarah Oh was Twitter’s former Human Rights Advisor and has a wealth of experience, including time spent on Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica-focused crisis team.

Oh says she was intrigued by “the possibility of centering a new platform that was simple and elegant around trust and safety.”

“I found it so compelling to start from scratch — build in all the lessons from the last five to ten years,” she explained to TechCrunch in a chat ahead of today’s announcements.

“On the rules side, I think there’s a lot of space for growth and closing the enforcement gap,” Oh continues. “We have really clear rules that we’re beginning to consult our communities and users on — whether or not people feel like these rules are in the right place, where we need to maybe be a little bit more aggressive or less aggressive…But we’re very bullish on being very upfront about what we expect on the platform,” she added.

This clarity will also assist T2 with moderation as it scales, which will include both human review and AI.

On the face of it, however, T2 as of today looks much like a stripped-down Twitter clone. The currently web-only app has a similar interface to Twitter for writing short posts, adding a photo, posting replies, and reposting or favoriting content. There’s also a highly visible reporting mechanism indicated with a flag icon beneath each post. Also like Twitter, T2 uses the same follower/following model for building out a network of people whose posts you want to see in your timeline. (As an early tester, I was surprised to find T2 was automatically following people for me — something it said it was doing to seed people’s initial networks.)

Despite its still scrappy nature — T2 isn’t even the startup’s final name, apparently, it’s only a placeholder — the company is moving forward to grow its user base. T2 has been starting to test the usage of community invites among different groups, we’re told. Once the startup better understands how and why invites are being distributed by users — and the success rates those invites have in terms of bringing in new members – it will widen access. This will likely be in one or two months.

“We know that people want to feel immediately connected to their friends and colleagues on a new social media platform,” said co-founder Sarah Oh. “We’re currently testing and rolling out community invites, which will help people connect with and welcome their existing personal networks onto T2. Right now, we’re testing with various kinds of users from different cohorts. Once we have a clearer idea of what works best, we’ll start rolling out the feature more broadly,” she noted.

Image Credits: T2 screenshot

 

In the near term, T2 is debuting a new verification process with the launch of its “Get the Checkmark” program timed to correspond to Twitter’s removal of legacy verification checkmarks across all users who aren’t paying for the Twitter Blue subscription. Twitter said its own checkmark removals will begin on April 1st and will include removing the verification from organizations and individuals who had previously qualified as “notable” under the company’s prior rules. Ahead of this, T2 users who are legacy checkmark holders can claim their T2 checkmark by filling out this form.

Image Credits: T2

T2 believes this serves as an ideal opportunity to cater to Twitter’s disgruntled users. Prior to April 1st (or whenever Twitter actually removes verified checks), T2 will verify its own users if they previously had Twitter verification. The company says that Twitter’s legacy process required verifying people’s identities, so it will continue to honor those checks on T2. These “Twitter legacy” T2 checkmarks will have little ruffles on them, as well.

Twitter accounts may have been verified if they were a company, non-profit, journalist, leader or executive, an individual in entertainment, an individual in sports, a content creator, or some other public figure or notable individual.

After Twitter removes its legacy checkmarks, T2 will switch over to a new verification flow. For now, while the app is small and in closed testing, this will involve chatting directly with a T2 representative. (A process that would make it very hard for bots to be verified!) Later on, T2 plans to scale this verification using in-app identity and selfie checks. These will be designated as “T2 Authenticated” profiles.

Though T2 remains in closed beta testing, the company has been slowly inviting people to join from its “five-digit” waitlist and has now begun to offer its community members invites they can dole out to others. The plan is to trial invites with a few more communities before a wider rollout begins.

In addition to these changes, T2 also revamped its logo and introduced its own version of Twitter’s long-lost “fail whale,” which appeared when the site had outages. On T2 it will be a “fail snail” instead. (See below). The app’s user interface has been polished up as well, with new iconography beyond the logo and other changes to make it a better experience for end users.

Image Credits: T2

Twitter alternative T2 launches new verification program, hires Discord engineering head as CTO by Sarah Perez originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/3pN4TjZ
via Technews
Share:

Lyft might drop shared rides, stay focused on basics under new CEO

Lyft might once again drop its shared rides offering, just one of several changes the company’s newly appointed CEO could make in a bid to focus on its core ride-hailing business and become profitable.

David Risher, who is taking over as Lyft’s CEO in mid-April, told TechCrunch in a wide ranging interview that other features may also be axed. For instance, the Wait & See feature, which allows riders in certain regions to pay a lower fare if they wait for the best-located driver, may end, he said.

“It’s possible that maybe we don’t need both of those anymore and that we can focus all our resources on doing a fewer number of things better,” Risher, the former Amazon executive, told TechCrunch. “Maybe it’s time for us to say the shared rides were great for a time, but it’s time to let that go.”

Lyft, co-founded by Logan Green and John Zimmer, launched shared rides in 2014 on a small scale before expanding the service. Uber launched Uber Pool the same year. Both companies dropped their carpooling services during the pandemic before reinstating new versions later. For Uber and Lyft, carpooling has historically been a money pit, a loss-generating ploy to attract riders with cheap fares.

While nothing is yet decided, the potential move is an example of how Lyft’s new management hopes to stem its losses and, eventually, pry some market share back from its main competitor and oft-described big brother Uber. Instead of adding new products like delivery or even selling the company (both of which Risher says aren’t going to happen), Lyft is going back to basics.

“The first order of business here is to focus on the basics of rideshare,” Risher said. “The reason I say that is because in this type of marketplace where you have competitors, you can’t be losing share to the other guy if you want to be around long term. And I think this duopoly is a good thing. In so many other markets, you really want, as a customer, some choice, and I think as a driver, you want choice. It keeps us honest and allows us to play off one another a bit.”

Uber, already a larger company, has taken more U.S. market share from Lyft in recent years, through an all-of-the-above approach that includes food delivery and even transit services. Today Uber’s market share has grown from 62% at the start of 2020 to about 74% today, versus Lyft’s 26%, according to YipitData.

Another study from Similarweb shows that Uber leads in monthly active users (MAUs), and that lead has grown over time. In February 2023 alone, Uber had 9.4 million MAUs, a 62% lead over Lyft’s MAU of 5.8 million. This time last year, Uber only had a 48% advantage over Lyft. Similarweb’s data also shows that Uber outranks Lyft on both Apple’s and Google’s app stores, and that over the past 12 months, its Android downloads were 22% higher than Lyft’s.

Uber has taken a different approach to Lyft in pursuit of profits. While Lyft has stuck with ride-hailing, Uber has expanded into delivery through its UberEats platform and added a a slew of new products as it aims to own to attract users, but also create a closed business loop wherein each product feeds customers back into other Uber channels.

“We are actively cross-selling food delivery consumers into grocery, grocery consumers into alcohol, and actually back now to mobility,” said Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi during the company’s third quarter 2022 earnings call held November 1. “All of the cross-sell that we have across the platform continues to increase, drive new customers and drive retention, as well.”

Risher said Lyft won’t try to compete with Uber by introducing a delivery product to the app, in part because he doesn’t consider delivery to be either a customer or driver-driven decision.

“From a driver’s perspective, they’re now shuttling in their mind between picking up a person versus picking up a pizza,” said Risher. “And when I pick up a pizza, I have to double park at the restaurant with seven other people, then I get a ticket once every couple of weeks, then I gotta get in my car again and drive, then get out and ring the doorbell. It’s a very different cycle than, ‘I’m picking people up and I’m just transporting them.'”

He also said riders might not want to be in a car that just dropped off a couple of pizzas.

The first order of business

“I think for a lot of people, Lyft has gone from top of mind to a little bit on the side, so it’s our job to remind people we exist and really give them a great experience,” said Risher.

That might mean ensuring Lyft doesn’t charge more than the competition and that its drivers pick up and drop off customers on time. In the past, Lyft was an attractive option because it offered cheaper rides than Uber. Now, after the post-COVID driver shortage, Lyft’s average price per mile is on par with Uber’s, according to more research from YipitData.

Risher didn’t say if Lyft will cut its workforce in an effort to rein in costs. However, CFO Elaine Paul hinted at taking such measures during the company’s fourth quarter 2022 earnings call. Paul also suggested Lyft shift to hiring workers outside the U.S. who are less likely to expect equity as part of compensation.

Risher seems most focused on creating more demand for the services, while making operations more efficient. Those efforts extend to increasing demand for Lyft’s micromobility business through some method of cross pollination between the two verticals, according to Risher.

“I don’t think we’ve given riders or bikers enough of a good reason to come and try us out on ride-share, as an example,” he said, noting that he is an avid cyclist. “If we have both of these ways for people to get around, how can they reinforce each other, because right now they’re a little too parallel.”

Lyft currently offers the Lyft Pink membership program that provide riders with ride-hail perks like free priority pickup upgrades and relaxed cancellations, as well as bike and scooter discounts. The membership also includes free Grubhub+ for a year and SIXT car rental upgrades, which represent a half-hearted attempt to capture more of the transportation market through partnerships.

Analysts are still wary on Lyft’s recovery

Lyft went public in March 2019 at a value of $24 billion. Today, Lyft’s market capitalization is around $3.35 billion. Uber’s market cap is $60.44 billion. Investors initially reacted favorably to Risher’s appointment, pushing its share price to $10.14 immediately following the announcement. But the positive reaction has been short-lived.  Lyft’s share price has fallen 11.4% from Tuesday’s high to close Wednesday at $8.98.

Tom White, senior research analyst at D.A. Davidson, told TechCrunch he remains neutral on the company with a $12.50 price target.

“We’ll admit the news came as somewhat of a surprise to us, but perhaps it shouldn’t have given the relative underperformance of LYFT shares and in Lyft’s core ridesharing business in recent quarters,” said White.

Lyft’s Q1 2023 revenue outlook remained unchanged by Risher’s appointment, but analysts recall that Lyft’s target ($975 million) was lower than what they had expected ($1.09 billion).

Lyft attributed the reduced outlook to colder weather, which leads to fewer ride-hail rides, shorter trips and a major dip in micromobility usage. Since Lyft is only active in North America, the company lacks the ability to balance poor ridership in one wintry part of the world with increase usage in other, warmer places.

Although Lyft’s strategy so far lacks the dazzle of shiny new products that might directly compete with Uber, Risher has some pretty good incentives to turn the company around (that is, aside from the pride of a job well done).

“As part of his equity compensation, [new CEO John Risher] received 12.25M performance-based restricted stock units, broken into nine tranches, each vesting separately at LYFT price hurdles from $15.00 to $80.00,” said Ben Silverman, director of research at investment research management firm VerityData. “The vesting schedule is vastly different from the founders’ awards received by Logan [Green] and [John] Zimmer in 2021 and 2022 which only vest if LYFT hits or exceeds $100.00. Clearly, that aspirational view has been muted. Regardless, Risher is tasked with a massive turnaround and if fully successful, can earn $980M.”

Lyft might drop shared rides, stay focused on basics under new CEO by Rebecca Bellan originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/U0gOcVe
via Technews
Share:

NASA pushes back Boeing Starliner’s crewed flight test to July

The first crewed flight test of Boeing’s Starliner capsule is facing yet another delay, with NASA officials saying Wednesday that it was now targeting no earlier than July 21 for launch.

The space agency and Boeing blamed the delay on certification issues related to the capsule’s parachute system and other verifications on Starliner’s components and capabilities, as well as scheduling constraints with other missions scheduled to fly to and from the International Space Station (ISS).

Steve Stich, NASA’s program manager for the commercial crew program, told reporters that NASA and Boeing needs to complete an additional ground test on the parachute system, as well as a test of Starliner’s abort system. Stress testing of the flight and guidance, navigation and control systems and additional testing with crew are due to be complete by the end of this month.

“The Starliner spacecraft is in really good shape,” Stich told reporters during a media briefing Wednesday, adding that it’s “largely ready for flight.”

Some of the additional testing is a result from Boeing engineers discovering an error in one of Starliner’s components.

“We fixed that. That was pretty simple to go do with a with a minor mod to the vehicle,” Mark Nappi, Boeing’s Starliner program manager, said Wednesday. “However, we want to make sure that that same condition doesn’t exist anywhere else. So part of this testing is to validate that this was an isolated case.”

The CST-100 Starliner mission was scheduled to launch in April, but that was pushed back last week to May to accommodate the Axiom Space’s Ax-2 private spaceflight mission to the ISS.

This mission is a key part of the overall testing campaign for the Starliner spacecraft, which NASA wants to use to regularly ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). If all goes to plan, Boeing’s Starliner would join SpaceX’s Dragon capsule and Russia’s Soyuz as the only human-certified spacecraft capable of the task. Starliner’s first orbital test, an uncrewed mission, successfully docked with the ISS last May.

Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner spacecraft after it landed at White Sands Missile Range last May. Image Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls via Getty Images

This upcoming crewed flight test will see Starliner carry two NASA astronauts, Barry Wilmore and Sunita Williams, to the ISS for at least an eight-day stint. While the spacecraft is docked with the station, the astronauts will perform additional vehicle check-outs. The mission is scheduled to launch on a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral Space Force Base in Florida.

If the mission is a success, NASA plans to likely certify Starliner for ISS missions. It has been a long road for the capsule’s development, with the Starliner program facing myriad issues including a botched test mission in 2019 and numerous delays.

“We know that what we’re doing is extremely important, launching humans in space and providing NASA with the second provider,” Nappi said. “So we’ll take our time and we’ll make sure that everybody’s confident with the work that’s been done.”

NASA pushes back Boeing Starliner’s crewed flight test to July by Aria Alamalhodaei originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/NuK9FJB
via Technews
Share:

6 VCs explain why embedded insurance isn’t the only hot opportunity in insurtech

If you think embedded insurance is the only hot thing in insurtech these days, we’ve got a surprise in store for you: While it’s true that startups that help sell insurance together with other products and services are enjoying tailwinds, there are plenty of other opportunities in the space, several investors told TechCrunch+.

You see, insurtech startups often need to take into account the myriad rules and regulations in place when they seek to innovate and embed insurance into products, which might make it difficult to pull it off. And given the current emphasis on achieving cost efficiency to extend runways in the broader startup ecosystem, it appears investors are open to insurtech startups that can build a sustainable business model, regardless of it including embedded insurance.

“Insurtech startups that do not offer embedded insurance, and rather provide other innovative solutions will still attract VC funding this year, especially if they can show cost-efficient and sustainable growth,” said Nina Mayer, a principal at Earlybird.

And according to David Wechsler, a principal at OMERS Ventures, “having an embedded strategy is not required for venture funding.”

Meyer added that there is particular interest in products that go beyond embedded insurance. “We are generally open to startups innovating any part of the value chain as long as the problem and market are big enough.”

This focus on cost efficiency instead of growth at all costs is driven by the same factors that affect startups more broadly. “It’s been a turbulent few months for all tech sectors, including insurtech,” said Stephen Brittain, director and co-founder of Insurtech Gateway.

There’s another reason why fundraising is harder for insurtech founders in 2023. Wechsler said, “Many firms who dabbled in insurtech (A.K.A. “tourist investors”) have left the space. This makes it much more challenging to close subsequent rounds.”

On the flip side, he predicts that corporates with venture capital arms that are “committed to the insurance sector will likely step up their involvement.”

This also seems true more broadly of venture funds with a strong insurtech thesis. “We are still bullish on insurtech and we have been active in 2023,” said Hélène Falchier, a partner at Portage Ventures.

But investors are being careful to not put all their eggs in one basket. “Beyond embedded insurance, we are also particularly excited by solutions tackling claims prevention or underwriting in verticals such as climate or cyber,” Mayer said.

Artificial intelligence will likely take longer to demonstrate its full potential for the insurance sector, but its current applications are already being tracked actively by venture capital funds.

Talking about generative AI and insurance, Astorya.vc’s founding partner, Florian Graillot, reported seeing a lot of enthusiasm around that topic. He thinks that early use cases may center on customer service, but is certain that more will follow.

“There is a lot more to expect from these generative AI solutions not only to smoothen the engagement with customers, but also to get a sense of customers’ risks, collect documents in the claim process, or maybe deliver reporting to the regulator. We are clearly in the early days, whatever the industry!”

Read on to find out what insurtech investors think about where the sector is heading in 2023, why they feel IoT and parametric insurance are a hot opportunity, how Apple will change the game if it ends up launching its insurance product and more.

We spoke with:


Florian Graillot, founding partner, Astorya.vc

Embedded insurance is growing in popularity as more companies find ways to bundle insurance products with their offerings. How important will it be for insurtech startups to have an embedded insurance product to attract funding this year?

It’s true we’ve seen a lot of insurtech startups rebranding themselves towards that positioning. I’d even say it became a buzzword. But there are few players really offering third parties a way to seamlessly add insurance solutions to their customer journeys (that’s how I would define embedded insurance).

I believe the time is past when claiming such a positioning was enough to raise money. Investors have matured and the market knows B2C and embedded insurtech are two very different companies. Hence, you cannot switch from one to another overnight.

But for startups that have the right balance between tech/product and insurance, there is a huge opportunity, as more and more platforms, e-commerce and marketplaces are looking for additional revenues on their existing customer base. That’s what such insurtech startups can offer them! We have long been pushy on such an indirect distribution, having invested in four embedded insurance startups in property and casualty, bancassurance, life, and SME insurance.

How has your approach to the insurtech industry changed since the last time we spoke in Q3 2022?

Since astoryaVC’s inception, we have been investing in tech-based startups and have done a lot of B2B / enterprise software deals in the insurance space. That hasn’t changed. And the current market is rather reinforcing our investment thesis.

By the way, that makes a lot of sense when you remember that insurtech is three to four years behind fintech in terms of investments, and insurers usually lag behind banks in digital adoption rankings.

In terms of maturity, we haven’t changed our seed focus, as this is where the market is the most active (almost half of deals announced last year in [Europe’s insurtech sector] were below €3 million, see here), and anyway, insurtech is still a very young industry.

Apple is reportedly launching health insurance in 2024, for which it may leverage data from its other offerings. What impact would this have on interest for data-driven approaches in the insurtech sector?

First, let me share: I’m very excited about that perspective, as we’ve long been very pushy towards third parties entering the insurance industry. The rationale behind that is if insurance claims it is all about data, usually platforms own more data on their (vertical) market! Who owns health data? The Apple watch, not insurers. Hence, it makes perfect sense that such a company considers entering that space.

Florian Graillot, founding partner, Astorya.vc. Image Credits: Florian Graillot

Obviously, there are many challenges to tackle, but at least they have the data and customers’ trust to share this data with them. Let’s see how they are delivering. And their huge customer base could be a competitive edge. See how they are doing in the payment space with Apple Pay!

Every time a big name enters insurance, there is always a mix of skepticism from incumbents and a reminder that change is needed. In the short term, I don’t expect any impact, but if the first figures of adoption are nice, re/insurers will probably kick off similar projects. It’s worth reminding that there is already such a project, live on the market: Vitality.

Do you expect B2B companies to follow Apple in this and leverage wearables data as well?

At least they should, as I believe they have three strengths to support such initiatives:

  1. they have a lot of customers;
  2. they own a lot of data on their customers;
  3. they have regular touch points with these customers.

We’re actually seeing more and more third parties launching insurance products. I’m thinking about Tesla in the car insurance market. In France, for instance, we have Blablacar, a ride sharing platform, and Ornikar, an online driving school, which have launched their own insurance solutions at scale. To make the link with the first question, we expect that move to accelerate as insurtech is developing “embedded insurance” solutions, which is the tech infrastructure required to plug insurance solutions to third-party platforms. For instance, it’s gaining momentum in the SME space!

As parametric insurance becomes a reality, which areas of insurance do you see extracting the most value from IoT applications?

Parametric insurance is a very exciting space: we’ve been discussing it for a few years now, but there are still only a few players delivering it at scale. Nevertheless, that addresses a real need in the market around what we call “new risks.” Not every insurer is offering such products: the risk didn’t exist a few years ago, and it is growing fast. Hence, there is a real challenge to spot relevant data sets and get a sense of them through algorithms. This opens the door to more insurtech / insurance partnership rather than competition.

In terms of use cases, weather insurance has been the hottest topic so far both in terms of the number of startups launched in that space, and by the scale of the most advanced players. But there are many other opportunities to tackle. I think about cyber insurance, which was hot recently. I also have in mind Cloud outage — we have invested in Riskwolf in that space. I think about digital assets as well: one can add new ways of working, etc.

When do you think that ChatGPT will start to have a tangible effect on insurance?

That’s a very good question. We see a lot of enthusiasm around that topic. The first use cases may be around the customer experience, and I even believe major attempts at leveraging ChatGPT in insurance recently are what we’ve long been expecting from “chatbots.”

But there is a lot more to expect from these generative AI solutions not only to smoothen the engagement with customers, but also to get a sense of customers’ risks, collect documents in the claim process, or maybe deliver reporting to the regulator. We are clearly in early days, whatever the industry!

6 VCs explain why embedded insurance isn’t the only hot opportunity in insurtech by Anna Heim originally published on TechCrunch


from https://ift.tt/52hjIPY
via Technews
Share:

Popular Post

Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Labels

Labels

Most view post

Facebook Page

Recent Posts

Blog Archive